This is backed up by the experience of Flyte web development company — “Content Creation is Painful” — who describe their experience with customers who decide to write their own copy as follows:
Before the job starts:
“I’m just going to take the content from the current site.”
“This stuff is going to write itself.”
“I expect to knock it out over the weekend. After all, this is my business.”
After the job ends:
“That took twice as long as I thought it would.”
“That reminded me of sitting in the dentist’s chair during the Novocaine shortage of ‘94.”
“You Web monkey bastards! You told me writing content was easy!”
No matter how much you love your job, no matter how passionate you are about what you do, writing content is going to be much more work than you think.
It’s funny because it’s true.
Ease the pain.
(Shameless plug alert.)
Hire a writer.
]]>And it’s proof that the best ideas are the simplest ones.
The Slanket creator, Gary Clegg, was hunkered down in his student dorm room one night, wrapped up in his sleeping bag watching TV, when he discovered he couldn’t work the remote without exposing his arms to the bitter cold that is life in a frigid dorm room.
A few snips of the scissors later and an early prototype of The Slanket was born. Several years, a manufacturing deal, and one website later and The Slanket 2.0 is a raging success. Even, dare I say, a hot product (sorry).
Its (now warm) creator is committed not only to keeping the world warm while it plays Playstation and eat popcorn on the sofa, but to bringing it together: “Across oceans, across cultural boundaries, let’s unify! One Slanket at a time.” is the handwritten message overseas buyers receive with their package of fleecy goodness.
]]>This quote stands out:
“Millions of email messages every day give people the information they need to do their job, and a badly written message can do a lot of damage. So can a badly written Web site.
“The new age, for all its electronic wizardy, is still writing-based.”
From attracting search engine traffic to selling products and services, there’s no doubt that good content and copy can help your website be more successful and, as Zinsser wrote, badly written copy can hurt it.
Yet, despite this, the creation of the words that will guide visitors through a website, describe the products or services and do the selling is still treated almost as an afterthought when businesses first develop their sites.
In many cases, a writer is later called in to add essential missing content or repair poorly-written copy that could have been costing a business who knows how much in lost revenues during the intervening weeks… months… years.
And often just a few tweaks will produce immediate results.
Shameless plug: Click here for a free review of your home page’s copy.
]]>
When I started as an 18-year-old trainee reporter at The Dundee Courier with dreams of uncovering corruption at the highest levels of Government (a la All The President’s Men), I was told that readers should be able to get the main points of a story just by reading the headline and first paragraph. And they should be able to just scan the front page to get a handle on the day’s most important news.
The conclusion comes first, and the rest of the story is fleshed out from there — the opposite of many other styles of story-telling that start slowly and build to a climactic ending.
This is known as the “inverted pyramid” style of writing, although the craggy old journo who gave me this advice would rather have stuck pins in his eyes than use such a jargony term as “inverted pyramid.”
And before the Internet took over the world, newspapers were the main outlet for this writing style.
Not any more.
Copywriting for the Web is a lot like writing for newspapers in terms of the overall structure. Your home page is the front page. And, just as newspapers have clearly-labelled departments, so websites have clearly-labelled sections.
When it comes to individual pieces of copy, just as newspapers try to grab the attention of readers with eye-catching headlines, so Internet pages need to grab the attention of browsers — and quickly — with similar headlines or offers. And just as newspaper readers are often pressed for time — preferring to browse the paper first, then dig down into the stories that interest them when they have more time — so you have to be conscious that the clock is constantly ticking on how long a visitor is prepared to hang around on your website.
That’s why you have to know your audience and target them well.
Then grab their attention and get your main points across. The details come later.
And no, I didn’t get my Watergate-style scoop. Sadly, the closest I came to uncovering corruption was questioning a referee’s offside decision when covering a football match.
]]>“Subbing” involves pulling a news story off the “wires” and editing it down to fit snugly in its allocated space in the newspaper layout. The sub-editor also has to add a headline and picture captions.
In front of you is a screen with your allocated page space, and you have to chop away at the article until there is no overspill.
Sometimes, if the original writer has fallen victim to a serious case of “writeyness” and ignored any length guidelines, this can involve hacking 1000 words down to 200 or 300 or less. And you could have as little as 20 minutes to do this in — all with a desk editor breathing down your neck.
It’s a great exercise for any writer in finding the meat of a story and cutting off the excess fat. And I’ve found it an invaluable skill to have when it comes to writing short, concise Web copy, and when editing copy supplied by clients.
Quite simply, Web copy has to be leaner than a butcher’s dog. And “lean” doesn’t necessarily mean short. Your copy should be as long as it takes to get your main points across in the most effective way.
If you’re worried that your copy is showing a little weight around the middle, click here for a free home page review. (No strings).
]]>Others, such as CNN, use subheads on the story page to expand on the main headline. (Subheads are also a great tool for stressing secondary benefits in sales copy.)
Of course, when it comes to headlines, you should try to avoid any embarrasing slip-ups, like these:
- “Juvenile Court to Try Shooting Defendant”
“Man Struck by Lightning Faces Battery Charge”
“Stolen Painting Found by Tree”
“Astronaut Takes Blame for Gas in Space”
While the Web and clever headlines may not always be a good fit, puns are still alive and kicking in the print media. And by far the best proponents of puntastic headlines are the British tabloids. Love ‘em… hate ‘em… eat your fish and chips off ‘em… the old Red Tops can spot a pun coming a mile off.
So, to end with, here’s the best headline in the world ever (in my opinion), from — who else? — The Sun. It appeared after Inverness Caley defeated Celtic 3-1 in a Scottish footballing shock result:
![]()
Genius. (And, just in case any of you didn’t see Mary Poppins as a child, this link should clarify things.)
]]>
One of my must-read websites for keeping up to date with things from a layman’s point of view is The Guardian’s technology section: Guardian Online.
Here are a couple of good resources in their archives:
Series of well-written “How to…” guides on everything from podcasting to RSS feeds.
A look at the people and ideas behind the new social networking Internet applications currently changing the way people interact (and do business) online: “Weekend Web 2.0 Issue”
]]>There are a couple of excellent posts on the blog just now looking at two issues relevant to any website looking to improve their search engine rankings:
Google’s Tips On Duplicate Content Worries looks at how Google views duplicate content.
Stop The Freak Out Over Linking looks at the dos and don’ts of using links to give your ranking a boost.
Anyone involved in working on their business’s website should keep up to date with search engine developments, and Search Engine Land is another great resource to add to your list.
]]>It’s interesting to compare this list to their previous one in 2004 — Cream of the crop: 100 most useful websites.
They rightly point out (taking the UK-view, as a British newspaper):
]]>“In 2004, the internet was a different place: there was, for example, no YouTube, and most Britons online didn’t have broadband. That’s changed dramatically: now, more than 75% of users have broadband, and the arrival of Web 2.0 has brought sites where the interaction is as fast as if it were on your machine.”